Bulletins

OF CANADA                                            DU CANADA   

             BULLETIN  OF                                          BULLETIN DES

             PROCEEDINGS                                          PROCÉDURES

November 21, 1997  2042 - 2095 (INDEX)                                          le 21 novembre 1997

CONTENTS                                                   TABLE DES MATIÈRES

Ghyslaine Rheault

André Carbonneau

c. (26281)

Jean-François Lebel (Qué.)

Pierre Spain

Biron, Spain

DATE DE PRODUCTION 10.11.1997

NOVEMBER 14, 1997 / LE 14 NOVEMBRE 1997

                                                  CORAM:  Chief Justice Lamer and Cory and McLachlin JJ. /

Le juge en chef Lamer et les juges Cory et McLachlin

                                                    Lumen Inc., Réal Nadeau, Télémédia Communications Inc.,

                                                            Urgel Delisle et Associés, Me André Vaillancourt,

                                  Me Pierre Geoffroy, Les Entreprises Serge Laliberté (Division Électricité) Inc.,

                                                         Georges Delisle Inc. et Coffrage Michel Constant Inc.

                                                                                                c.  (26187)

                                                              Le Procureur Général du Canada (Crim.)(Qué.)

ET ENTRE:

                                                                                        Jacques Blanchette

                                                                                                        c.

                                                                           Le Procureur Général du Canada

                                                                                                      -et-

                                                    Lumen Inc., Réal Nadeau, Télémédia Communications Inc.,

                                                            Urgel Delisle et Associés, Me André Vaillancourt,

                                  Me Pierre Geoffroy, Les Entreprises Serge Laliberté (Division Électricité) Inc.,

                                            Georges Delisle Inc. et Coffrage Michel Constant Inc. (Crim.)(Qué.)

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Droit criminel - Législation - Interprétation - Créancier et débiteur - “Droit sur un bien” au sens de l’art. 462.42 (a) du Code criminel  - Est-ce que l’application de l’article 462.42(1) doit être subordonnée aux dispositions de droit civil applicables dans chacune des provinces du Canada? - Est-ce que les créanciers ordinaires d’une personne dont les biens ont été confisqués en vertu de l’article 462.37(1) peuvent avoir un intérêt dans les biens confisqués et présenter une requête en vertu de l’article 462.42  du Code criminel  pour faire reconnaître leur intérêt et leurs droits dans les biens confisqués? - Est-ce que le texte de l’article 462.42 fait une distinction entre les différentes catégories de créanciers, soient les créanciers ordinaires et les créanciers dits garantis ou privilégiés? - Si l’interprétation de l’article 462.42 conduit à faire cette distinction, ne doit-il pas être déclaré inconstitutionnel, puisque contraire à l’article 92(13) de l’Acte d’Amérique du Nord Britannique qui gouverne les champs de juridiction respectifs des provinces et du gouvernement fédéral? - Si une distinction entre les différentes catégories de créanciers doit être maintenue, ne constitue-t-elle pas une forme de discrimination allant à l’encontre de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés ? Est-ce que la Cour d’appel a commis une erreur en ne statuant que les créanciers ordinaires n’ont pas un intérêt valide dans les biens confisqués à la suite de la condamnation de leur débiteur pour blanchiment d’argent en vertu du Code criminel  du Canada - La Cour d’appel a-t-elle erré en droit en ne statuant que l’avocat de la défense détenteur d’un droit sur les biens saisis, ayant satisfait toutes les exigences de l’article 462.34.4.c C.Cr et ayant fait reconnaître la raisonnabilité des honoraires réclamés, aux termes des exigences de l’article 462.34.5 C.Cr, n’a pas l’intérêt nécessaire pour faire de lui un tiers intéressé au sens de l’article 462.42 C.Cr?

HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL

                                                                                    Her Majesty the Queen

                                                                                                v. (26210)

                                                                           Ralph Jake Klassen (Crim.)(Y.T.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Criminal law - Sentencing - Manslaughter - Domestic violence - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the current sentencing “range” for crimes of this nature properly reflects the principles of retribution and denunciation - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that taking the spousal relationship between the victim and offender into account would amount to the impermissible judicial creation of a category of offence within a statutory offence for the purpose  of sentencing.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

                                                                                  Harry Edward MacDonald

                                                                                                v. (26088)

                                                              The Corporation of the Village of Bayfield (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Municipal law - Zoning by-law offences - Whether a prosecution can succeed where the gravamen of the offence is not defined - Whether an expression which is carelessly drafted or of doubtful meaning in a by-law ought to be strictly construed, particularly where it relates to zoning by-laws and a restriction of property rights - Effect of ambiguity where a defendant is at risk of a quasi-criminal offence.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

                                                           The Board of Education of the Eston-Melrose School

                                                                            Division No.33 of Saskatchewan

                                                                                                v. (26188)

                                                                                   Barbara Leavins (Sask.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Administrative law - Judicial review - Statutes - Interpretation - The Education Act, R.S.S. 1978, c.E-0.1, s.222(3) - “Error of law on the face of the record” - Whether the statutory right to review for “error of law on the face of the record” is restricted to review only pure questions of law - Whether the Court of Appeal applied the correct standard of review to the Board of Reference decision - Whether boards of education are able to make decisions based on the best interests of students as the paramount consideration.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

CORAM: L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier and Bastarache JJ. /

Les juges L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier et Bastarache

                                                                            Marie-Cécile Windisch-Laroche

                                                                                                c. (25911)

                                Jacques Biron, André Quesnel, Guy Boissonneault et le Tribunal des professions

et

Rémi H. Lair, le Procureur général du Québec et Jocelyne Gaudreau (Qué.)

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Charte canadienne des droits et libertés  - Droit administratif - Contrôle judiciaire - Violation d’une règle déontologique - Théorie de la nullité pour cause d’imprécision - Requête de la demanderesse en évocation pour que soit déclaré nul et constitutionnellement inapplicable, invalide et inopérant pour violation des principes de droit administratif et/ou des dispositions de la Charte canadienne  l’art. 2.03.17 du Code de déontologie de la Corporation professionnelle des médecins du Québec rejetée - Appel rejeté - Le juge de première instance et la Cour d’appel ont-ils erré en refusant de conclure que le Tribunal des professions avait donné une interprétation manifestement déraisonnable à l’article 2.03.17 du Code de déontologie des médecins?

HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL

La Commission scolaire crie

                                                                                                c. (25974)

                                                             Bernard Lefebvre, Robert Seers et Bernard Vick

et

L’Association de l’enseignement du Nouveau-Québec (C.E.Q.) et Hugh Mahabir (Qué.)

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Droit du travail - Arbitrage - Grief - Renvoi - Contrôle judiciaire - Requête en évocation de sentences arbitrales - En présence d’un conflit de valeurs entre une communauté autochtone et un enseignant chargé de transmettre valeurs et connaissances aux enfants fréquentant l’unique école de cette communauté, un tribunal d’arbitrage qui impose une mesure réparatrice en cas de rupture du lien d’emploi de cet enseignant doit-il ordonner une mesure autre que la réintégration, et ainsi exercer la discrétion qui lui est conférée à cet égard par le Code du travail, L.R.Q. 1977 ch. C-27, et la convention collective qui régit les conditions d’emploi du dit enseignant, particulièrement lorsqu’une clause de cette convention collective oblige expressément l’arbitre au respect des valeurs sociales et morales de ladite communauté autochtone?

HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL

                                                            Marianne Lisenko, Stefania et William Osadchuk

                                                                                                c. (26104)

                                                          Commission scolaire St-Hyacinthe Val-Monts (Qué.)

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Procédure - Procédure civile - Appel - Preuve - La Cour d’appel a-t-elle erré en accordant à la demanderesse une “dernière” extension de délai de trente jours pour le dépôt de son mémoire? - La Cour d’appel a-t-elle erré en rejetant la requête de la demanderesse visant à obtenir la permission d’interroger deux témoins et d’introduire une nouvelle preuve?

HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL

                                                                                   Sharon Marie Bracklow

                                                                                                v. (26178)

                                                                             Frank Patrick Bracklow (B.C.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Family law - Maintenance  - Family Relations Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 128 - Termination of support order for disabled spouse - Parties self -supporting during four years of cohabitation and most of three years of marriage - Former wife having two children from previous relationship - Former wife’s mental and physical health deteriorating in latter part of marriage - Former wife disabled and unemployable - Former husband having paid spousal support pursuant to court order for period of five years - Court setting termination date on continuing support - Former wife appealing termination of support - Whether Court of appeal erred in terminating support for disabled spouse - Whether Court of Appeal properly applied the principles of support as established in Moge v. Moge - Whether Court of Appeal improperly emphasized the implied agreement of self-sufficiency during the marriage in assessing Applicant’s entitlement to continuing support.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

                                                Scotia Bond Company Limited and Midland Walwyn Capital Inc.

                                                                                                v. (26182)

                                                             Douglas Williamson and George Williams (N.S.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Commercial law - Securities - Stockbrokers - Vicarious liability - Damages - Breach of fiduciary duty - Whether a fiduciary duty existed between an investment company and/or one of its stockbrokers and a client - Whether there was a breach of fiduciary duty - Whether the investment company was vicariously liable for the conduct of its stockbroker, who was also the president of the company - Whether the principle of ratification applies to breaches of fiduciary duty - Appropriate measure of damages.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

September 13, 1996

Supreme Court of Nova Scotia

(Goodfellow J.)

Respondent Williamson’s action against Respondent  Williams and Applicants dismissed; counterclaim dismissed

June 9, 1997

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal

(Freeman, Matthews and Chipman JJ.A.)

Appeal allowed; action remitted to the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia for assessment of damages and determination of costs

September 8, 1997

Supreme Court of Canada

Application for leave to appeal filed

CORAM: Sopinka, Iacobucci and Major JJ. /

Les juges Sopinka, Iacobucci et Major

                                                    Harold Perry and Mitchell Shewell on their own behalf, and

                                                     on behalf of the Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies,

                                                             and the Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies

                                                                                                v. (26167)

                                                                   Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario

                                                                                                     -and-

                                                             Chief Robert Whiteduck, in his personal capacity

                                                      and on behalf of the Algonquin Management Circle (Ont.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Canadian Charter  - Civil - Section 35  of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms  - Constitutional law - Indians - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in failing to consider whether the IEP is discriminatory - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in deciding that the IEP is not “legislation” and consequently not ultra vires the province pursuant to s. 91(24)  of the Constitution Act, 1867  - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the application became moot  - Whether the Court of Appeal erred its analysis of the remedies.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

                                                                                           Boris Netupsky

                                                                                                v. (26206)

                                                  The Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists

                                                                    of the Province of British Columbia (B.C.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Administrative law - Judicial review - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in refusing to set aside a Notice of Inquiry and to prohibit the Respondent from proceeding with a hearing, both under the Engineers and Geoscientists Act, R.S.B.C. 1979, c. 109.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

                                                                                         Barry Ceminchuk

                                                                                                v. (26265)

                                                                Her Majesty In Right of Canada (F.C.A.)(Alta.)

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural Law - Civil Procedure - Perfecting appeals - Whether appeals properly dismissed for failure to perfect.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

NOVEMBER 19, 1997 / LE 19 NOVEMBRE 1997

24752                    MICHAEL FEENEY - v. - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crim.)(B.C.)

CORAM:               The Chief Justice and L’Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka,

Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ.

The motion is granted.  The stay of the judgment ordered by this Court on June 27, 1997 is extended to December 19, 1997 or, in the alternative, to the day Bill C-16 (An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Interpretation Act (powers to arrest and enter dwellings)) receives Royal Assent if this occurs prior to December 19, 1997.

La requête est accueillie. Le sursis d’exécution ordonné par notre Cour le 27 juin 1997 est prolongé jusqu’au 19 décembre 1997 ou jusqu’à la date de la sanction royale du projet de loi C-16 (Loi modifiant le Code criminel et la Loi d’interprétation (arrestation et entrée dans les habitations)) si cet événement survient avant le 19 décembre 1997.

NOVEMBER 20, 1997 / LE 20 NOVEMBRE 1997

26161                    HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN - v. - JOHN SUNDOWN (Crim.)(Sask.)

CORAM:               The Chief Justice and Cory and McLachlin JJ.

The application for leave to appeal is granted.

La demande d'autorisation d'appel est accordée.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Criminal Law - Indian - Aboriginal rights - Nature and scope of the constitutionally protected hunting rights of Aboriginal peoples, in particular, whether or not those rights include the right to build permanent structures like log cabins on lands where the rights may be exercised - Ability of provincial governments to control and regulate development in Provincial Parks and on other Crown lands.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

26136                    HENRY JOHN SAVA - v. - T.P. BATES PERSONALLY, AND BORDEN & ELLIOT, SOLICITORS AND RYSZARD ABRAMOWICZ AND THE ESTATE OF KAROL ABRAMOWICZ WITH T.P. BATES, SOLICITOR FOR BOTH DEFENDANTS (Ont.)

CORAM:               The Chief Justice and Cory and McLachlin JJ.

The application to adduce new evidence is dismissed. The application for extension of time is granted and the application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

La demande de présentation de nouveaux éléments de preuve est rejetée. La demande de prorogation de délai est accordée et la demande d'autorisation d'appel est rejetée avec dépens.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural law - Did lower courts err in disposition of Applicant’s action and appeals?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

June 8, 1994

Ontario Court (General Division) (Borins J.)

Citation orders issued in Respondent estate vacated; Order respecting costs issued October 28, 1994

January 10, 1995

Divisional Court (Steele .)

Notice of appeal quashed

February 6, 1995

Ontario Court (General Division) (Greer J.)

Motion for stay of order discharging certificate of pending litigation dismissed

February 7, 1995

Divisional Court

(Southey, Rosenberg and Boland JJ.)

Application to set aside order of Steele J. dated January 10, 1995 and orders of Borins J. dated June 8, and October 28, 1994 dismissed

June 23, 1995

Ontario Court (General Division) (Conant J.)

Application to set aside orders of Borins J. dated June 8, and October 28, 1994 dismissed

26191                    561895 ONTARIO INC. AND CHARMOND INVESTMENTS LTD., JEAN PIERRE CHARBONNEAU AND JOANNE CHARBONNEAU - v. - METROPOLITAN TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA, METROPOLITAN TRUSTCO LIMITED, AURELE SIMOURD, WAYNE LECUYER, PEAT MARWICK THORNE INC., BEACON HILL LODGES OF CANADA LTD., 974005 ONTARIO INC., CUMBERLAND LODGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, UVESCO-INVESTMENT SYNDICATIONS INC., 974126 ONTARIO INC. AND RICHARD RACETTE (Ont.)

CORAM:               The Chief Justice and Cory and McLachlin JJ.

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

La demande d'autorisation d'appel est rejetée avec dépens.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Property law - Land titles - Real rights - Procedural law - Appeal - Interlocutory orders - Lis pendens - What are the criteria by which a court should determine whether or not to discharge a certificate of pending litigation issued against the title to a property - Whether an order to discharge a certificate of pending litigation is an interlocutory or a final order.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

25858               SA MAJESTÉ LA REINE c. EDMON KABBABE (Crim.)(Qué.)

CORAM:           Les juges L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier et Bastarache

La demande d’autorisation d’appel est accordée.

The application for leave to appeal is granted.

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Droit criminel - Charte canadienne des droits et libertés  - Preuve - Procédure préalable au procès - Droit au silence - L’honorable juge Joseph Nuss, de la majorité, a-t-il erré en droit en déterminant que les dispositions de l’article 4  de la Loi sur la preuve au Canada , L.R.C. 1985 ch. C.5  s’appliquent à une enquête tenue par le commissaire aux incendies et ce, par l’effet de l’article 25 de la Loi concernant les enquêtes sur les incendies S.R.Q. ch. E-8? - Le fait pour un commissaire aux incendies de contraindre à témoigner une personne soupçonnée d’incendie criminel contrevient-il aux droits fondamentaux de cette personne, tels que prévus à l’article 7  de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés  et spécialement à son droit au silence, tel que défini par cette Cour dans l’arrêt R. c. Hebert [1990] 2 R.C.S. 151.

HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL

26152               CYNTHIA DOBSON v. RYAN LEIGH MACLEAN DOBSON BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN, GERALD M. PRICE (N.B.)

CORAM:           L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier and Bastarache JJ.

The application for leave to appeal is granted.

La demande d’autorisation d’appel est accordée.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Torts - Negligence - Whether the New Brunswick Court of Appeal erred in finding that the infant Respondent has the legal capacity to commence or continue an action in negligence against the Applicant, his mother, for injuries suffered due to the Applicant’s negligence while the infant Respondent was en ventre sa mere - Whether the New Brunswick Court of Appeal erred in distinguishing between alleged negligent acts committed by pregnant women in the course of making “lifestyle choices” and negligent acts committed in the course of operating motor vehicles.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

25996               SYNDICAT DES POSTIERS DU CANADA - c. - SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DES POSTES - et - M^E ANDRÉ BERGERON (Qué.)

CORAM:           Les juges L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier et Bastarache

La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Droit du travail - Accidents du travail - Indemnisation - Droit administratif - Contrôle judiciaire - Législation - Interprétation - Entreprise fédérale - Agents de l’État - Récupération par l’employeur de sommes versées à l’employé qui s’absente pour cause d’accident du travail ou de maladie professionnelle lorsque la Commission de la santé et de la sécurité au travail (CSST), le Bureau de révision paritaire (BRP) ou la Commission d’appel en matière de lésion professionnelle (CALP) conclut que la réclamation de l’employé n’est pas fondée - Interprétation de la Loi sur l’indemnisation des agents de l’État , L.R.C. (1985), chap. G-5 , (L.I.A.E. ), et de la Loi sur les accidents du travail et les maladies professionnelles, L.R.Q. chap. A-3.001 (L.A.T.M.P.) - La Cour d’appel du Québec a-t-elle erré en droit en déterminant que l’article 363 de la L.A.T.M.P. est inapplicable aux agents de l’État? - La Cour d’appel a-t-elle erré en droit en décidant que la convention collective et la Loi   sur la gestion des finances publique s L.R.C. (1985), chap. F-11 , autorisent le remboursement des sommes versées à un agent de l’État au titre d’un accident du travail ou d’une maladie professionnelle?

HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL

26011               SUCCESSION ANDRÉ DUBOIS, MICHELINE LEDUC DUBOIS, MARIE MANON DUBOIS, MARIE GERMAINE CHANTALE DUBOIS, FRANCE DUBOIS, ELZÉAR DUBOIS, MARIE ANTOINETTE PETIT DUBOIS ET MAXIME DUBOIS MÉTHOT c. LE MINISTÈRE DES TRANSPORTS DU QUÉBEC ET LE PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL DU QUÉBEC - et - LA SOCIÉTÉ DE L’ASSURANCE AUTOMOBILE DU QUÉBEC (Qué.)

CORAM:           Les juges L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier et Bastarache

La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

NATURE DE LA CAUSE

Droit commercial - Assurance - Procédure - Procédure civile - Accident - Action en dommages - Requête en irrecevabilité - Application de la Loi sur l’assurance automobile, L.R.Q. ch. A-25 - La Cour d’appel du Québec a-t-elle commis une erreur dans son interprétation des mots “causés par l’usage” utilisés aux paragraphes 1.1 et 1.10 de la Loi sur l’assurance automobile? - La Cour d’appel a-t-elle commis une erreur en décidant que l’accident en l’espèce était un accident visé par la loi précitée?

HISTORIQUE PROCÉDURAL

26089                    HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. WALLACE MARVIN SCOTT (Crim.)(Man.)

CORAM:               Sopinka, Iacobucci and Major JJ.

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.

La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Criminal law - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in deciding that the trial judge applied the wrong test in determining the Respondent’s guilt - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in deciding that trial judges sitting alone ought to follow the process set out in R. v. W.D., [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742 in giving reasons for judgment.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

26175                    ISHWARI PRASAD v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crim.)(Alta.)

CORAM:               Sopinka, Iacobucci and Major JJ.

The application for extension of time is granted and the application for leave to appeal is dismissed.

La demande de prorogation de délai est accordée et la demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Criminal law - Credibility - How are trial judges to instruct themselves or a jury in circumstances where there is no corroborative evidence, where there are major discrepancies in the evidence of a child witness, and where both the complainant and the accused have given credible evidence - Whether a trier of fact may ignore major discrepancies in the evidence of a child complainant and go on to convict an accused even though the evidence of that accused was not discredited - Whether a trial judge must instruct herself or a jury concerning the discrepancies or inconsistencies that arise within the evidence of a child complainant - Whether there is a duty upon a trial judge to determine which of those inconsistencies or discrepancies may be major and which may be considered to be peripheral or minor such as not to attract concern from the trier of fact.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

26094                    RENA ANN QUINN v. CANADIAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL LTD. (Ont.)

CORAM:               Sopinka, Iacobucci and Bastarache JJ.

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Environmental law - Air law - Action for damages for injuries allegedly sustained on board aircraft - Applicant with pre-existing severe osteoporosis in her spine suffering crushed vertebrae following a flight - Aircraft encountering “moderate” turbulence during flight- Applicant first experiencing pain upon entering back seat of a vehicle after the flight - Whether turbulence constituted an “accident “ within the meaning of the Warsaw Convention, as amended by the Montreal Agreement to which the Respondent is signatory - Whether trial judge erred in interpretation of accident pursuant to Air France v. Saks (1985), 105 S.Ct. 1338 - Whether trial judge erred in concluding turbulence not an accident.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

26170                    DANIEL C. LYNE v. CANADA (NATIONAL CAPITAL COMMISSION) (Ont.)

CORAM:               Sopinka, Iacobucci and Major JJ.

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.

La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Procedural law - Courts - Constitutional law - Division of Powers - Jurisdiction of a Justice of the Peace to hear charges against the Applicant pursuant to s. 16(1) of the National Capital Commission Traffic and Property Regulations, C.R.C. c. 1044 - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in upholding the decision dismissing the Applicant’s application.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

December 8, 1995

Ontario Court of Justice (General Division)

(Chilcott J.)           

Applicant’s application for an order prohibiting a justice of the peace from hearing the charges against him dismissed

June 3, 1997

Court of Appeal for Ontario

(Houlden, Doherty and Weiler JJ.A.)

Appeal dismissed

September 2, 1997

Supreme Court of Canada  

Application for leave to appeal filed

26135                    GAN CANADA INSURANCE COMPANY v. PRIYA PRASAD (Ont.)

CORAM:               Sopinka, Iacobucci and Major JJ.

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.

La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Statutes - Statutory instruments - Interpretation - Insurance - Insurance Act, R.S.O.1990, c.I.8 - Ontario Regulation 672 Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule: Accidents Before January 1, 1994 - Whether the terms of an automobile insurance approved under the Insurance Act take precedence over the provisions of the Act and Regulations if there is a conflict - Whether the territorial limit in s.243 in the Insurance Act  applies to all coverage under the Ontario Automobile Policy or only to third party liability coverage as found by the Court of Appeal.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

31.10.1997

Before / Devant: MAJOR J.

Motion to appoint counsel

George Zarubin

   v. (25699)

Her Majesty The Queen (Sask.)

Requête en nomination d’un procureur

DISMISSED / REJETÉE

31.10.197

Before / Devant: MAJOR J.

Motion to extend the time in which to apply for leave to appeal

George Zarubin

    v. (25699)

Her Majesty The Queen (Sask.)

Requête en prorogation du délai pour obtenir l’autorisation d’appel

DISMISSED / REJETÉE

14.11.1997

Before / Devant: THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR

Motion to extend the time in which to file an intervener’s factum

Victor Daniel Williams

    v. (25375)

Her Majesty The Queen (B.C.)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour déposer le mémoire d’un intervenant

With the consent of the parties.

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE   Time extended to November 12, 1997.

14.11.1997

Before / Devant: L’HEUREUX-DUBÉ J.

Motion for a stay of execution

Attorney General of Ontario

    v. (25838)

M. and H. (Ont.)

Requête en vue de surseoir à l'exécution

With the consent of the parties.

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE  

14.11.1997

Before / Devant: L’HEUREUX-DUBÉ J.

Motion to extend the time in which to serve the application for leave

Arthur Robert Winters

   v. (26180)

Legal Services Society (B.C.)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour signifier la demande d’autorisation

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE   Time extended to September 15, 1997.

 18.11.1997

Before / Devant: THE REGISTRAR

Motion to extend the time in which to file the case on appeal and the appellant’s factum

Her Majesty The Queen

    v. (25670)

Al Klippert Ltd. (Alta.)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour déposer le dossier d’appel et le mémoire de l’appelante

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE   Time extended to September 5, 1997 to file the case on appeal and time extended to October 30, 1997 to file the appellant’s factum.

19.11.1997

Before / Devant: THE REGISTRAR

Motion to extend the time in which to file the appellant’s record and factum

Deltonia R. Cook

    v. (25852)

Her Majesty The Queen (B.C.)

Requête en prorogation du délai imparti pour déposer le dossier et le mémoire de l’appelant

With the consent of the parties.

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE   Time extended to January 18, 1998.

20.11.1997

Before / Devant: THE REGISTRAR

Motion for acceptance of memorandum of argument on leave to appeal of over 20 pages

Steven Olah

    v. (26280)

Her Majesty The Queen (Ont.)

Requête en acceptation d'un mémoire de demande d'autorisation de plus de 20 pages

With the consent of the parties.

GRANTED / ACCORDÉE  

14.11.1997

CORAM:               Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ.

Beth Naomi Fontaine

    v. (25381)

Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (B.C.)

Robert A. Easton, for the appellant.

Patrick G. Foy and A.M. Gunn, for the respondent.

GONTHIER J. (orally for the Court):

The appeal is dismissed with costs, reasons to follow.

LE JUGE GONTHIER (oralement au nom de la Cour):

L’appel est rejeté avec dépens, motifs à suivre.

14.11.1997

CORAM:               L’Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Major JJ.

Emma Nieto Bablitz

    v. (25239)

Her Majesty The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.)

Richard A. Stroppel, Q.C., for the appellant.

Ken Tjosvold, for the respondent.

It will not be necessary to hear you Mr. Tjosvold. 

This is an appeal as of right.  On the sole issue before us, we are in agreement with  the reasons of the Court of Appeal and, consequently, we would dismiss the appeal.  Accordingly, it is not necessary to deal with the Crown’s motion to quash.

Il ne sera pas nécessaire de vous entendre M. Tjosvold.

 Ce pourvoi nous vient de plein droit.  Sur le seul point devant nous, nous sommes d’accord avec les motifs de la majorité de la Cour d’appel et nous sommes donc d’avis de rejeter l’appel.  En conséquence, il n’est pas nécessaire de traiter de la requête de la couronne en cassation.

AGENDA for the week beginning November 24, 1997.

ORDRE DU JOUR pour la semaine commençant le 24 novembre 1997.

Date of Hearing/                           Case Number and Name/    

Date d'audition                             Numéro et nom de la cause

The Court is not sitting this week

La Cour ne siège pas cette semaine

NOTE: 

This agenda is subject to change.  Hearing dates should be confirmed with Process Registry staff at (613) 996-8666.

Cet ordre du jour est sujet à modification.  Les dates d'audience devraient être confirmées auprès du personnel du greffe au (613) 996-8666.

CUMULATIVE INDEX -                                                     INDEX CUMULATIF - REQUÊTES

APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO                                   EN AUTORISATION DE POURVOI

APPEAL

This index includes applications for leave to appeal standing for judgment at the beginning of 1997 and all the applications for leave to appeal filed or heard in 1997 up to now.

Cet index comprend les requêtes en autorisation de pourvoi en délibéré au début de 1997 et toutes celles produites ou entendues en 1997 jusqu'à maintenant.

*01         Refused/Refusée

*02         Refused with costs/Refusée avec dépens

*03         Granted/Accordée

*04         Granted with costs/Accordée avec dépens

*05         Discontinuance filed/Désistement produit

*A           Applications for leave to appeal filed/Requêtes en autorisation de pourvoi produites

*B           Submitted to the Court/Soumises à la Cour

*C           Oral Hearing/Audience

*D           Reserved/En délibéré

Status/               Disposition/

CASE/AFFAIRE                                                                                           Statut                Résultat                                                       Page                                                            

100242 Canada Inc. (Uniprix Inc.) c. Proulx (Qué.), 26249, *A                          1868(97)

111648 Canada Inc c. Astra Plaza Ltd. (Qué.), 25722, *02 12.6.97                   1029(97)                   1132(97)

2439-4637 Québec Inc. c. Procureur général du Québec (Crim.)(Qué.),

   25620, *02 27.2.97                                                                                    31(97)                      401(97)

2550-9613 Québec Inc. c. Ville de Val D’Or (Qué.), 26176, *A                         1492(97)

2760-5450 Québec Inc. c. Procureur général du Québec (Qué.), 25634, *02

   13.3.97                                                                                                    336(97)                    513(97)

2903113 Canada Inc. c. Régie des marchés agricoles et alimentaires du

   Québec (Qué.), 26256, *A                                                                          1868(97)

3044190 Canada Inc. c. Procureur général du Québec (Qué.), 25914, *02

   12.6.97                                                                                                    949(97)                    1131(97)

453333 B. C. Ltd. v. Primex Investments Ltd. (B.C.), 25729, *02 24.4.97          624(97)                    758(97) 561895 Ontario Inc. v. Metropolitan Trust Co. of Canada (Ont.), 26191, *02

   20.11.97                                                                                                  1962(97)                   2053(97)

587855 Ontario Ltd. v. Industrial-Alliance Life Insurance Co. (Ont.), 25489,

   *02 13.2.97                                                                                              1961(96)                   294(97)

587855 Ontario Ltd. v. Piazza, Polowin, Brooks & Siddons (Ont.), 25624,

   *02 13.2.97                                                                                              23(97)                      295(97)

A.F. v. The Queen (Ont.), 26123, *A                                                              1621(97)

A.M.S. c. W.D.C. (Qué.), 26228, *01 7.11.97                                                 1970(97)                   1988(97)

Aarvi Construction Co. v. Morin (Ont.), 25949, *01 18.9.97                               1340(97)                   1538(97)

Abouchar v. Conseil scolaire de langue française d’Ottawa-Carleton --

   Section publique (Ont.), 25899, *03 16.10.97                                              1210(97)                   1825(97)

Abrahams v. Scott (B.C.), 26224, *A                                                             1734(97)

Agence J.W.E.R. Bernier Ltée c. Ultramar Canada Inc. (Qué.), 25737, *02

   29.5.97                                                                                                    909(97)                    1045(97)

Ahani v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25580, *02 3.7.97                                     105(97)                    1355(97)

Air Canada v. Air Treads of Canada Ltd. (Ont.), 25984, *02 11.9.97                  1348(97)                   1530(97)

Air Line Pilots Association v. Canadian Airlines International Ltd. (B.C.),

   26221, *A                                                                                                 1734(97)

Albert v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 25736, *01 28.8.97                                    1334(97)                   1456(97)

Alberta Pharmaceutical Association v. Finlay (Alta.), 26080, *02 2.10.97          1510(97)                   1664(97)

Alco Dispensing Canada Ltd. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26202, *A              1622(97)

Alexander v. Habib (Ont.), 25950, *02 18.9.97                                                1341(97)                   1538(97)

Ali v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25766, *01 10.4.97                                         546(97)                    699(97)

Alldrew Holdings Ltd. v. Nibro Holdings Ltd. (Ont.), 25551, *02 6.3.97               24(97)                      473(97)

Allison v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25876, *01 22.5.97                                   816(97)                    962(97)

Alta Surety Co. v. Campbell Comeau Engineering Ltd. (N.S.), 26098, *02

   16.10.97                                                                                                  1627(97)                   1839(97)

Altoba Development Ltd. v. Saskpower (Sask.), 25759, *02 19.6.97                 677(97)                    1174(97)

Aménagement Westcliff Ltée c. Société immobilière du Québec (Qué.),

   25115, *B                                                                                                 683(96)

American Home Co. c. Administration de la voie maritime du

   Saint-Laurent (Qué.), 25794, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed

   with costs and the application for leave to cross-appeal is dismissed 3.7.97   950(97)                    1352(97)

Anamor Investments Inc. c. Levy Pilotte et Associés Inc. (Qué.), 25743, *02

   19.6.97                                                                                                    1032(97)                   1188(97)

Apotex Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25348, *03 6.2.97                      1676(96)                   216(97)

Apotex Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25723, *02 22.5.97                 459(97)                    965(97)

Apotex Inc. v. Merck Frosst Canada Inc. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25419, *03 6.2.97       1677(96)                   218(97)

Arditi c. Nolan (Qué.), 25557, *A                                                                   1789(96)

Arp v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 26100, *03 16.10.97                                      1495(97)                   1833(97)

Arrow Construction Products Ltd. v. Attorney General of Nova Scotia (N.S.),

   25370, *02 9.1.97                                                                                     1426(96)                   46(97)

Arvaluk v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.W.T.), 25607, *01 27.2.97                              37(97)                      408(97)

Attorney General of Canada v. CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. (Crim.)(B.C.),

   25944, *03 16.10.97                                                                                  1445(97)                   1833(97)

Attorney General of Canada v. Schreiber (F.C.A.)(Crim.)(Alta.), 26039, *03

   4.9.97                                                                                                      1341(97)                   1522(97)

Attorney General of Ontario v. M. (Ont.), 25838, *03 24.4.97                            680(97)                    1106(97)

Avis Immobilien G.M.B.H. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25749, *02 22.5.97      688(97)                    958(97)

Avrith c. Miller (Qué.), 26003, *02 25.9.97                                                      1497(97)                   1641(97)

Aytel Property Management Inc. v. Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region

   No. 23 (Ont.), 26121, *A                                                                            1621(97)

B.C. c. M.E.K. (Qué.), 25920, *02 11.9.97                                                      1428(97)                   1527(97)

B.D. v. The Queen in right of the province of British Columbia (B.C.),

   26025, *01 9.10.97                                                                                    1515(97)                   1747(97)

B. J. Kern & Son Ltd. v. Settlers Savings and Mortgage Corporation Inc.

   (Sask.), 25698, *02 19.6.97                                                                       394(97)                    1172(97)

B.M.-L. c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26137, *01 23.10.97                                   1630(97)                   1876(97)

B. Rawe GmbH & Co. c. Classic Fabrics Corporation (Qué.), 25183, *01

   29.5.97                                                                                                    815(96)                    1040(97)

Bablitz v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 25239, *01 1.5.97                                    11(97)                      822(97)

Baddeley v. Duncan (Alta.), 26046, *02 6.11.97                                              1744(97)                   1984(97)

Bahlsen v. The Queen as represented by the Minister of Transport (F.C.A)(Ont.),

   25783, *02 19.6.97                                                                                    690(97)                    1175(97)

Bains v. Bhandar (B.C.), 25491, *02 6.2.97                                                    1873(96)                   220(97)

Baker v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25823, *03

   4.9.97                                                                                                      683(97)                    1520(97)

Bal v. Attorney General for Ontario (Ont.), 26116, *A                                       1960(97)

Balogh v. Balogh (Ont.), 25752, *02 24.4.97                                                   679(97)                    758(97)

Bara Academy of Business Sciences Ltd. v. The Queen in Right of Alberta

   (Alta.), 26036/37, *02 25.9.97                                                                    1416(97)                   1645(97)

Barbican Properties Inc. v. The Queen (F.C.A)(B.C.), 25760, *02 19.6.97         691(97)                    1182(97)

Barnabe v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (Ont.), 25099, *05 24.6.96   939(96)                    70(97)

Barrett v. Waters (Ont.), 25424, *02 30.1.97                                                   1736(96)                   158(97)

Barron v. The Queen (Minister of National Revenue) (F.C.A.)(B.C.), 25947,

   *02 10.7.97                                                                                              1214(97)                   1367(97)

Bastings-Allard c. Bastings (Qué.), 26079, *A                                                1327(97)

Batchewana Indian Band v. Corbiere (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25708, *03 24.4.97           552(97)                    754(97)

Beck v. Beck (Sask.), 26087, *02 25.9.97                                                     1437(97)                   1651(97)

Bégin c. Ville de Québec (Qué.), 25630, *02 27.2.97                                       288(97)                    418(97)

Beloit Canada Ltée/Ltd. v. Oy (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25849, *05 2.5.97                       888(97)                    888(97)

Beno v. Létourneau (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26058, *01 2.10.97                                    1518(97)                   1669(97)

Benoit c. Diab (Qué.), 25517, *05 6.1.97                                                        70(97)                      70(97)

Bérard c. Compagnie Montréal Trust (Qué.), 25908, *02 16.10.97                     1511(97)                   1836(97)

Bergevin c. Brasserie Labatt Inc. (Qué.), 25978, *01 23.10.97                         1636(97)                   1881(97)

Bese v. Director, Forensic Psychiatric Institute (Crim.)(B.C.), 25855, *03 8.5.97                               613(97) 865(97)

Betker v. The Queen (Ont.), 26026, *A                                                          1865(97)

Bird Construction Co. v. Sault Ste. Marie Public Utilities Commission (Ont.),

   26111, *02 2.10.97                                                                                    1514(97)                   1667(97)

Bisson c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 25821, the application for leave to appeal

   is granted on isssues 1 and 2 only 19.6.97                                                 908(97)                    1169(97)

Black v. Ernst & Young Inc. (N.S.), 24792, *A                                               1188(95)

Black v. Krupp Mak Maschinenbau Gmbh (N.S.), 25724, *02 3.7.97                1101(97)                   1360(97)

Blackburn-Moreault c. Moreault (Qué.), 25776, *A                                           281(97)

Blagrove c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 25510, *01 6.2.97                                     2148(96)                   211(97)

Blanchard c. La Reine (Qué.), 26268, *A                                                        1960(97)

Bluebird Footwear Inc. c. General Motors Acceptance Corporation

   of Canada (Qué.), 24386, *A                                                                      1764(94)

Board of Education for the City of Toronto v. Ontario Human Rights Commission

   (Ont.), 25884, *02 18.9.97                                                                         1340(97)                   1537(97)

Board of Education of the Eston-Elrose School Division No. 33 of Saskatchewan

   v. Leavins (Sask.), 26188, *B                                                                     2045(97)

Board of School Trustees of School District No. 46 (Sunshine Coast) v. Sunshine

   Coast Teachers’ Association (B.C.), 26204, *A                                           1622(97)

Body v. Town of Wolfville (N.S.), 25487, *01 30.1.97                                       1937(96)                   162(97)

Boeyen v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 25418, *01 22.5.97                                  741(97)                    960(97)

Bonamy v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 26063, *01 2.10.97                                 1505(97)                   1661(97)

Bonamy v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 26247, *B                                              2011(97)

Boreal Property and Casualty Insurance Co. v. Warneke Inc. (Ont.), 25932,

   *02 21.8.97                                                                                              1338(97)                   1454(97)

Bottrell v. Bottrell (B.C.), 25789, *02 8.5.97                                                    691(97)                    869(97)

Bourassa c. Caisse populaire de Verdun (Qué.), 25728, *02 5.6.97                  951(97)                    1107(97)

Bourdon v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 25717, *01 13.3.97                                 336(97)                    512(97)

Boutet c. Commission de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration (C.A.F.)(Qué.),

   26010, *B                                                                                                 1966(97)

Bracklow v. Bracklow (B.C.), 26178, *B                                                         2047(97)

Brandao c. Département de science politique, faculté des arts et des

   sciences (Qué.), 25616, *02 30.1.97                                                           27(97)                      153(97)

Brass v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 26109, *01 18.9.97                                    1496(97)                   1548(97)

Brault c. Fontaine (Qué.), 23953, *A                                                              196(94)

Bray v. United States of America (Ont.), 25909, *A                                         1818(97)

Brazeau c. Guay (Qué.), 25560, *02 6.2.97                                                    33(97)                      212(97)

Brignolio v. Desmarais (Ont.), 25403, *A                                                        1202(96)

Brill v. Duckett (Alta.), 26184, *A                                                                  1493(97)

British Columbia Government and Service Employees’ Union v. Government of

   the Province of British Columbia (B.C.), 26274, *A                                      1960(97)

British Columbia Milk Marketing Board v. Bari Cheese Ltd. (B.C.), 25574, *05

   18.3.97                                                                                                    2147(96)                   570(97)

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees c. Compagnie des chemins

   de fer nationaux du Canada (Qué.), 25937, *02 16.10.97                               1628(97)                   1845(97)

Brough v. Giroday (B.C.), 26124, *02 6.11.97                                                 1741(97)                   1976(97)

Brouillette c. Société d’agriculture du comté de Verchères (Qué.), 25791,

   Vu les arrêts Construction Gilles Paquette Ltée c. Entreprises Végo Ltée

   (Qué.)(25090) et Syndicat des postiers du Canada c.Société canadienne

   des postes (Qué.)(25093), l’affaire est renvoyée à la Cour d’appel du Québec

   pour qu’elle en décide, eu égard aux motifs desdits arrêts/In view of the

   decisions in Construction Gilles Paquette Ltée v. Entreprises Végo Ltée

   (Que.)(25090) and Canadian Union of Postal Workers  v. Canada Post

   Corporation (Que.)(25093), the case is remanded to the Quebec Court of

   Appeal to be decided having regard to the reasons in the said decisions

   16.10.97                                                                                                  1334(97)                   1827(97)

Budget Car Rentals Toronto Ltd. v. Cummings (Ont.), 25530, *02 20.2.97         2101(96)                   352(97)

Buffalo v. The Queen in Right of Canada (F.C.A.)(Alta.), 26018, *01 26.6.97     1164(97)                   1246(97)

Bullock v. Key Property Management Inc. (Ont.), 26074, *B                            1501(97)

Burchill v. Yukon Travel (Yuk.), 25525, *02 9.1.97                                          2096(96)                   44(97)

Burden v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25393, *01 1.5.97                                     34(97)                      826(97)

Burke v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25980, *01 18.9.97                                    1339(97)                   1537(97)

Burns v. United States of America (Crim.)(B.C.), 26211, *B                             2010(97)

CCLC Technologies Inc. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Alta.), 25631, *02 19.6.97        342(97)                    1170(97)

C.L.S.C. - N.D.G. Montréal-Ouest c. Syndicat des employés du

   C.L.S.C. - N.D.G. Montréal-Ouest (Qué.), 25118,Vu les arrêts Construction

   Gilles Paquette Ltée c. Entreprises Végo Ltée (Qué.)(25090) et Syndicat

   des postiers du Canada c.Société canadienne des postes (Qué.)(25093),

   l’affaire est renvoyée à la Cour d’appel du Québec pour qu’elle en décide, eu

   égard aux motifs desdits arrêts, le tout sans frais/In view of the decisions in

   Construction Gilles Paquette Ltée v. Entreprises Végo Ltée (Que.)(25090) and

   Canadian Union of Postal Workers  v. Canada Post Corporation (Que.)(25093),

   the case is remanded to the Quebec Court of Appeal to be decided having

   regard to the reasons in the said decisions, the whole without costs 29.5.97  685(96)                    1037(97)

C.S.L. Group Inc. c. St. Lawrence Seaway Authority (Qué.), 25769, the

   application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs and the application

   for leave to cross-appeal is dismissed 3.7.97                                               950(97)                    1352(97)

Cain v. The Queen (Ont.), 26132, *A                                                             1409(97)

Caldwell & Ross Ltd. v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.B.), 25882, *01 19.6.97               815(97)                    1176(97)

Callow v. Board of School Trustees of School District No. 45 (B.C.), 25891,

   *02 26.6.97                                                                                              1159(97)                   1226(97)

Cameron v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 25774, *01 10.7.97                                1211(97)                   1365(97)

Campbell (Clive Everald) v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25390, *01

   30.1.97                                                                                                    1796(96)                   159(97)

Campbell (John) v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25780, *03 3.7.97                       1158(97)                   1355(97)

Canada Employment and Immigration Commission v. Nielsen (F.C.A.)(B.C.),

   26194, *A                                                                                                 1621(97)

Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. (Alta.),

   25895, *02 2.5.97                                                                                     693(97)                    864(97)

Canadian Aids Society v. The Queen in right of the province of Ontario (Ont.),

   25756, *02 8.5.97                                                                                     748(97)                    873(97)

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation v. Batiot (Crim.)(N.S.), 25859, *01 3.4.97   625(97)                    696(97)

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Sovereign Life Insurance Co. (B.C.),

   26181, *A                                                                                                 1492(97)

Canadian Lawyers’ Insurance Association v. Yang (Alta.), 26043, *02 2.10.97   1505(97)                   1661(97)

Canadian Newspaper Co. v. Moises (B.C.), 25522, *01 30.1.97                        7(97)                        147(97)

Canadian Newspapers Co. v. Kansa General Insurance Co. (Ont.), 25632, *02

   5.6.97                                                                                                      285(97)                    1107(97)

Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society v. Superintendent of Banff

   National Park (F.C.A.)(Alta.), 25583, *01 20.2.97                                         18(97)                      346(97)

Canadian Red Cross Society v. Krever (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25810, *03 27.3.97         553(97)                    630(97)

Canderel Ltd. v. The Queen (Ont.), 24663, *03 8.5.97                                     875(97)                    875(97)

Cape Breton Beverages Ltd. v. Attorney General of Nova Scotia (N.S.),

   26148, *B                                                                                                 1968(97)

Capobianco c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 25725, *01 12.6.97                              810(97)                    1130(97)

Cardoso v. Budd (Man.), 25658, *02 10.4.97                                                  504(97)                    700(97)

Carousel Travel 1982 Inc. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26162, *B                   2015(97)

Carter v. Boardman (N.B.), 25921, *02 23.10.97                                             1736(97)                   1883(97)

Carter Motor Cars Ltd. v. Morrison (B.C.), 25853, *02 26.6.97                          1104(97)                   1242(97)

Castlepoint Development Corporation v. McLeod (Ont.), 25930, *02 21.8.97      1339(97)                   1454(97)

Ceminchuk v. The Queen in right of Canada (F.C.A.)(Alta.), 26265, *B             2050(97)

Central Supply Company (1972) Ltd. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26164, *B    2015(97)

Centretown Guest House Ltd. v. M.R.S. Trust Co. (Ont.), 25636, *02 13.2.97    23(97)                      296(97)

Chabot c. Lahlou (Qué.), 25869, *02 25.9.97                                                  1508(97)                   1658(97)

Chadbourne v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25585, *01 13.2.97                            30(97)                      290(97)

Chadjideris v. Toronto-Dominion Bank (Ont.), 25502, *02 20.2.97                     16(97)                      356(97)

Charalambous v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 26106, *01 16.10.97                      1624(97)                   1837(97)

Charland v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 25656, *01 10.4.97                                500(97)                    699(97)

Charette v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 25870, *01 22.5.97                                815(97)                    962(97)

Chassé c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 25464, *01 9.1.97                                       2050(96)                   42(97)

Chief Electoral Officer of Canada v. Sauvé (F.C.A.)(Man.), 25992, *A               1026(97)

Children’s Foundation v. Bazley (B.C.), 26013, *03 16.10.97                            1442(97)                   1843(97)

Chilton v. Chilton (B.C.), 25654, *02 13.3.97                                                   139(97)                    507(97)

Chippewas of Kettle and Stony Point v. Attorney General of Canada (Ont.),

   25795, *03 29.5.97                                                                                    862(97)                    1047(97)

Chu v. Hutchinson (B.C.), 25681, *01 27.3.97                                                 388(97)                    627(97)

Chui-Mei c. Directrice de la Maison Tanguay (Crim.)(Qué.), 25761, *01 22.5.97  741(97)                    959(97)

Chung v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25410, *01 30.1.97                                    1675(96)                   157(97)

Church of Scientology of Toronto v. The Queen (Ont.), 26177, *A                    1492(97)

City of Calgary v. Calgary Police Association (Alta.), 25979, *02 25.9.97           1415(97)                   1645(97)

City of Surrey v. McIntosh Estates Ltd. (B.C.), 26266, *A                                1869(97)

Clark (Bruce) v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 25988, *01 31.7.97                          1209(97)                   1451(97)

Clark (Margaret Jean) v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25989, *02 31.7.97            1209(97)                   1451(97)

Clermont c. Office Municipal d’habitation de St-Jérôme (Qué.), 25890, *05

   24.6.97                                                                                                    1253(97)                   1253(97)

Colas c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26269, *A                                                    1899(97)

Cloutier (Jean) c. Monty (Qué.), 25528, *02 6.2.97                                          32(97)                      213(97)

Cloutier (Laurin) c. Automobiles Gloginor Inc. (Qué.), 26253, *A                       1868(97)

Colwell v. Cowie (Ont.), 25577, *02 15.5.97                                                    206(97)                    923(97)

Comité paritaire de l’industrie de l’automobile de la Mauricie c. Gestion

   Jean-Guy Roy Inc. (Qué.), 26227, *A                                                          1735(97)

Commercial Union Assurance Co. of Canada v. City of Surrey (B.C.),

   26006, *02 18.9.97                                                                                    1434(97)                   1541(97)

Commission d’appel en matière de lésions professionnelles c. J. M.

   Asbestos Inc. (Qué.), 25617, *03 24.4.97                                                   395(97)                    752(97)

Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail c. Caron, Belanger, Ernst

   & Young Inc. (Qué.), 26192, *A                                                                  1493(97)

Commission scolaire Crie c. Lefebvre (Qué.), 25974, *B                                  2046(97)

Commonwealth Investors Syndicate Ltd. v. Canada Deposit Insurance

    Corporation (B.C.), 25416, *02 9.1.97                                                        2051(96)                   43(97)

Condello v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25893, *01 22.5.97                                 861(97)                    963(97)

Confederation Financial Sercices (Canada) Ltd. v. Zurich Indemnity Co.

   of Canada (Ont.), 25621, *02 13.3.97                                                          344(97)                    519(97)

Congress of Aboriginal Peoples v. Twinn (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26169, *A                  1491(97)

Consortium Developments (Clearwater) Ltd. v. Corporation of the City of

   Sarnia (Ont.), 25604, *03 13.3.97                                                               345(97)                    520(97)

Construction McNicoll Inc. c. Royal Trust Co. (Qué.), 25873, *02 25.9.97          1435(97)                   1640(97)

Continental Bank Leasing Corporation v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25532,

   *03 6.3.97                                                                                                2153(96)                   474(97)

Cook (Deltonia R.) v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 25852, *03 3.7.97                    814(97)                    1356(97)

Cook (Robert Leighton) v. Parcel, Mauro, Hultin & Spaanstra, P.C. (B.C.),

   25954, *02 10.7.97                                                                                    1216(97)                   1369(97)

Coopérative d’habitation Nolin Inc. c. Caisse Populaire Desjardins de la

   Grande-Baie (Qué.), 25180, Vu les arrêts Construction Gilles Paquette Ltée

   c. Entreprises Végo Ltée (Qué.)(25090) et Syndicat des postiers du Canada

   c.Société canadienne des postes (Qué.)(25093), l’affaire est renvoyée à la Cour

   d’appel du Québec pour qu’elle en décide, eu égard aux motifs desdits arrêts,

   le tout sans frais/In view of the decisions in Construction Gilles Paquette Ltée

   v. Entreprises Végo Ltée (Que.)(25090) and Canadian Union of Postal Workers

   v. Canada Post Corporation (Que.)(25093), the case is remanded to the Quebec

    Court of Appeal to be decided having regard to the reasons in the said 

   decisions, the whole without costs 29.5.97                                                 687(96)                    1038(97)

Coopérative de Commerce “Des Mille-Îles” c. Société des alcools du

   Québec (S.A.Q.) (Qué.), 25703, *02 19.6.97                                                688(97)                    1218(97)

Coopers & Lybrand Ltd. v. Ford Motor Co. of Canada Ltd. (Sask.),

   25710, the application for leave to appeal is remanded to the Saskatchewan

   Court of Appeal to be dealt with in accordance with this Court’s decision in

   Royal Bank of Canada v. Sparrow Electric Corporation, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 411

    19.6.97                                                                                                   503(97)                    1180(97)

Corbin v. City of Winnipeg (Man.), 26054, *02 2.10.97                                     1514(97)                   1666(97)

Corporation municipale de Sainte-Lucie-des-Laurentides c. Congrégation

   de l’Aumisme - Les Pèlerins de l’Absolu (Qué.), 25622, *02 27.2.97              207(97)                    415(97)

Corporation of the City of Thunder Bay v. Oosthoek (Ont.), 25659, *02

   26.6.97                                                                                                    392(97)                    1228(97)

Corporation of the Town of Wasaga Beach v. Sinclair (Ont.), 26102, *A            1329(97)

Corporation of the Township of Langley v. T & T Mushroom Farm Ltd.

    (B.C.), 26160, *01 13.11.97                                                                      1902(97)                   2021(97)

Côté v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25854, *03 19.6.97                                       813(97)                    1184(97)

County of Athabasca No. 12 v. Lachance (Alta.), 25913, *02 18.9.97               1441(97)                   1543(97)

Cousins v. The Queen (Nfld.), 26276, *A                                                        1960(97)

Cranwill v. Nieman (Alta.), 25872, *02 26.6.97                                                1125(97)                   1224(97)

Créations Marcel Therrien Inc. c. Falcone (Qué.), 25571, *02 6.2.97                 31(97)                      213(97)

Cross c. The Queen (Crim.)(Qué.), 25754, *01 8.5.97                                      746(97)                    871(97)

D.B.L. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 25385, *01 30.1.97                                   1441(96)                   155(97)

D. P. v. F. H. (Qué.), 25526, *02 20.2.97                                                        1941(96)                   350(97)

Dallaire c. Commission de l’emploi et de l’assurance du Canada (C.A.F.)

   (Qué.), 25667, *02 24.4.97                                                                         551(97)                    753(97)

D’Andrade v. Government of Canada (Ont.), 25310, application for extension

   of time is dismissed 5.9.96; file closed 23.9.96                                            1259(96)                   1544(96)

Daoud c. The Queen (Crim.)(Qué.), 25635, *01 13.3.97                                   139(97)                    508(97)

Dasilva v. Corporation of the City of Toronto (Ont.), 26086, *02 25.9.97            1499(97)                   1657(97)

Daum v. Schroeder (Sask.), 26004, *A                                                          1095(97)

Davis v. Hamelin (B.C.), 25157, *02 6.3.97                                                     1872(96)                   468(97)

De L’Isle c. Succession de feu Jochem Carton (Qué.), 26190, *B                    2014(97)

De Niverville c. Ministre du Revenu national (C.A.F.)(Qué.), 26075, *02 6.11.97 1741(97)                   1976(97)

Dekany v. Bank of Canada (Ont.), 26038, *02 25.9.97                                    1449(97)                   1655(97)

Del Grande v. Toronto Dominion Bank (Ont.), 26053, *02 23.10.97                   1737(97)                   1880(97)

Delisle c. Procureur général du Canada (Qué.), 25926, *03 16.10.97                 1636(97)                   1847(97)

Denis c. Ville de Val-Bélair (Qué.), 25662, *02 24.4.97                                    622(97)                    755(97)

Deniso Lebel Inc. c. Compagnie Price Limitée (Qué.), 25589 *02 30.1.97          20(97)                      150(97)

Deniso Lebel Inc. c. Procureur général du Québec (Qué.), 25588, *02

   30.1.97                                                                                                    20(97)                      149(97)

Deniso Lebel Inc. c. Procureur général du Québec (Qué.), 25590, *02

   30.1.97                                                                                                    21(97)                      150(97)

Derrick Concrete Cutting & Coring Ltd. v. Central Oilfield Service Ltd.

   (Alta.), 25425, *02 6.3.97                                                                           1738(96)                   468(97)

Des Champs v. Conseil des écoles séparées catholiques de langue française

   de Prescott-Russell (Ont.), 25898, *03 16.10.97                                          1210(97)                   1825(97)

Deschamps c. Procureur général du Canada (C.A.F.)(Qué.), 26154, *A             1412(97)

Desbiens c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 25805, *01 26.6.97                                  1157(97)                   1225(97)

Descoteaux c. Barreau du Québec (Qué.), 26023, *02 6.11.97                         1743(97)                   1977(97)

Descoteaux c. Barreau du Québec (Qué.), 26024, *02 6.11.97                         1742(97)                   1978(97)

Desfossés c. Rock (F.C.A.)(Crim.)(Qué.), 26131, *01 25.9.97                          1503(97)                   1642(97)

Desfossés c. Warden of Parthenais Prevention Center (Crim.)(Qué.), 25695, *01

   21.4.97                                                                                                    761(97)                    1064(97)

Desfossés c. Warden of Parthenais Prevention Center (Crim.)(Qué.), 25696, *01

   21.4.97                                                                                                    761(97)                    1064(97)

Desfossés c. Warden of Parthenais Prevention Center (Crim.)(Qué.), 25763, *01

   21.4.97                                                                                                    195(97)                    1064(97)

Desgrosseilliers v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25649, *01 13.2.97                      104(97)                    292(97)

Desjardins c. La Reine (Crim.)(Sask.), 25669, *01 27.3.97                               386(97)                    626(97)

Deslauriers c. Labelle (Qué.), 26115, *B                                                        1965(97)

Dibattista v. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (Ont.), 25543, *02

   27.2.97                                                                                                    2151(96)                   406(97)

Dicaire c. Commission de l’assurance-emploi Canada (C.A.F.)(Qué.), 26225, *A                              1734(97)

Dilalla c. Ville de Montréal (Qué.), 25523, *02 19.12.96                                    2098(96)                   41(97)

Dixie Park Inc. v. Tak-Hing Chow (Ont.), 25208, *02 16.1.97                           2054(96)                   50(97)

Dixon v. Governor in Council (F.C.A)(B.C.), 26234, *A                                     1865(97)

Dobson v. Dobson (N.B.), 26152, *03 20.11.97                                              1872(97)                   2054(97)

Doliente v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 25417, *01 27.2.97                                 206(97)                    413(97)

Domm v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25803, *01 8.5.97                                     746(97)                    872(97)

Dorfer v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 25432, *01 20.3.97                                    1431(96)                   562(97)

Dorfman v. National Trust Co. (Ont.), 25903, *02 18.9.97                                1434(97)                   1542(97)

Double Bar L Ranching Ltd. v. Bayvet Corporation (Sask.), 25706, *02

   19.6.97                                                                                                    745(97)                    1176(97)

Dowling v. City of Halifax (N.S.), 25493, *03 6.2.97                                         1871(96)                   219(97)

Dubé c. Bélec (Qué.), 25679, *01 13.3.97                                                       338(97)                    516(97)

Dubois c. La Reine (Qué.), 26252, *A                                                            1868(97)

Duchesne c. Giasson (Qué.), 25904, *02 13.11.97                                          1905(97)                   2023(97)

Dueck v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (F.C.A.)(Crim.)(Ont.),

   25811, *03 3.4.97                                                                                     615(97)                    695(97)

Duha Printers (Western) Ltd. v. The Queen (F.C.A.)(Man.), 25513, *03

   6.3.97                                                                                                      2100(96)                   472(97)

Dunn v. The Queen (Crim.)(P.E.I.), 25444, *01 8.5.97                                     2052(96)                   867(97)

Dyck v. Dyck (Alta.), 25498, *01 6.3.97, L’Heureux-Dubé J. dissenting             1963(96)                   471(97)

Dykun v. Odishaw (Alta.), 26113, *02 2.10.97                                                 1502(97)                   1660(97)

E.H. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25321, *01 18.9.97                                       1439(97)                   1544(97)

E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Co. v. United Tire & Rubber Co. (Ont.),

   25545, *A                                                                                                 2143(96)

Ed Miller Sales & Rentals Ltd. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. (Alta.), 25594, *02

   1.5.97                                                                                                      144(97)                    828(97)

Éditions Vice Versa Inc. c. Aubry (Qué.), 25579, *04 6.2.97                            105(97)                    214(97)

Eggleston v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 26159, *01 13.11.97                             1901(97)                   2020(97)

Eisnor v. The Queen (Alta.), 26279, *A                                                          1960(97)

Elguindi v. Canada (Minister of Health) (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26090, *02 23.10.97       1637(97)                   1882(97)

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Apotex Inc. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25477, *02 30.1.97                    1797(96)                   160(97)

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Apotex Inc. (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 26259, *A                                 1869(97)

Ellipse Fiction/Ellipse programme c. Cinévidéo Plus Inc. (Qué.), 26258, *A       1869(97)

Émond c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26067, *01 25.9.97                                      1504(97)                   1643(97)

Épiciers Unis Métro-Richelieu Inc. c. Lefebvre (C.S.N.)(Qué.), 25542, *02

   30.1.97                                                                                                    21(97)                      148(97)

Ethier c. Asea Industrie Ltd. (Qué.), 25672, *02 13.3.97                                  339(97)                    515(97)

Eurig v. Registrar of the Ontario Court (General Division), (Ont.), 25866, *03

   3.7.97                                                                                                      1164(97)                   1364(97)

Euro-Can-Am Trading Inc. v. Attorney General of Ontario (Crim.)(Ont.),

   26057, *01 21.8.97                                                                                    1345(97)                   1452(97)

FBI Foods Ltd. v. Cadbury Schweppes Inc. (B.C.), 25778, the application for

   leave to appeal and the application for leave to cross-appeal are granted 4.9.97                             1335(97)           1521(97)

F.K. v. The Queen (Crim.)(Sask.), 25683, the application for externsion of

   time is dismissed 15.5.97                                                                          203(97)                    919(97)

F.L. c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26138, *01 23.10.97                                        1630(97)                   1876(97)

Fabrikant c. Concordia University (Qué.), 25850, *02 11.9.97                           1426(97)                   1526(97)

Falso v. De Stefanis (B.C.), 25677, *02 10.4.97                                              388(97)                    698(97)

Federated Foods Ltd. v. Toronto-Dominion Bank  (Ont.), 25591, *02 20.3.97     28(97)                      556(97)

Federated Insurance Co. of Canada v. Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation

   (Man.), 25998, *02 25.9.97                                                                        1425(97)                   1639(97)

Fédération des médecins résidents du Québec c. Université de Montréal (Qué.),

   26163, *A                                                                                                 1490(97)

Fednav International Ltd. c. Sidmar N.V. (F.C.A.)(Qué.), 25961, *02

   18.9.97                                                                                                    1424(97)                   1550(97)

Feeney v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 24752, *03 19.11.97                                 2051(97)                   2051(97)

Fegol v. Manitoba Agricultural Credit Corporation (Man.), 25437, *01 30.1.97    1442(96)                   156(97)

Ferguson v. The Queen (Crim.)(Alta.), 25535, *01 20.2.97                               1962(96)                   351(97)

Filzmaier v. Laurentian Bank of Canada (Ont.), 25372, *A                               1154(96)

Fitzpatrick v. The Queen (Crim.)(Ont.), 25819, *01 26.6.97                              1163(97)                   1245(97)

Fleet v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.S.), 25863, *01 25.9.97                                      860(97)                    1659(97)

Flynn v. The Queen (Crim.)(B.C.), 25663, *01 13.3.97                                     104(97)                    507(97)

Folorunsho (Akeem Olufemi) v. Minister of Employment and Immigration

   (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25719, *01 15.5.97                                                              550(97)                    923(97)

Folorunsho (Akeem Olufemi) v. Minister of Employment and Immigration

   (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25839, *01 15.5.97                                                              549(97)                    925(97)

Folorunsho (Simiyu Adesanya) v. Minister of Employment and Immigration

   (F.C.A.)(Ont.), 25797, *01 15.5.97                                                              549(97)                    924(97)

Fondations Sylvon Roy Inc. c. Trust général du Canada (Qué.), 25977, *02

   6.11.97                                                                                                    1742(97)                   1977(97)

Ford Motor Co. of Canada, Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue (F.C.A.)(Ont.),

   26084, *02 16.10.97                                                                                  1628(97)                   1846(97)

Forges du Lac Inc. c. La Reine (Crim.)(Qué.), 26085, *01 18.9.97                    1446(97)                   1547(97)

Fournier c. Jacques Léger & Associés (Qué.), 25818, *01 11.9.97                    1349(97)                   1534(97)

Fradet c. Centre de camions St-Prime Inc. (Qué.), 25569, *02 13.2.97             140(97)                    291(97)

Francoeur c. Ménard (Qué.), 26222, *A                                                          1734(97)

Friends of the Lubicon v. Daishowa Inc. (Ont.), 25608, *01 19.6.97                  285(97)                    1179(97)

Furness Withy (Chartering) Ltd. c. St. Lawrence Seaway Authority (Qué.),

   25770, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs and the

   application for leave to cross-appeal is dismissed 3.7.97                              950(97)                    1352(97)

Furtak v. The Queen (Man.), 26117, *01 25.9.97                                            1430(97)                   1649(97)

Gagné (Louise Lévesque) c. Sirois (Qué.), 25600, *02 13.3.97                          202(97)                    562(97)

Gagné (Michel) c. Lacelle (Qué.), 25267, *A                                                   627(96)

Gale v. Hominick (Man.), 26002, *01 16.10.97                                                1438(97)                   1842(97)

Galuego v. Hensley (Ont.), 25806, *02 19.6.97                                               955(97)                    1186(97)

Gan Canada Insurance Co. v. Prasad (Ont.), 26135, *02 20.11.97                    1908(97)                   2058(97)

Gannon Bros. Energy Ltd. v. Robert Lemmons & Associates Ltd. (Sask.),

   25731, *02 26.6.97                                                                                    620(97)                    1232(97)

Garantie, compagnie d’assurance de l’Amérique du Nord c. Inter-Cité

   Construction Ltée (Qué.), 25116, Vu les arrêts Construction Gilles Paquette

   Ltée c. Entreprises Végo Ltée (Qué.)(25090) et Syndicat des postiers du

   Canada c.Société canadienne des postes (Qué.)(25093), l’affaire est renvoyée

   à la Cour d’appel du Québec pour qu’elle en décide, eu égard aux motifs

   desdits arrêts, le tout sans frais/In view of the decisions in Construction

   Gilles Paquette Ltée v. Entreprises Végo Ltée (Que.)(25090) and Canadian

   Union of Postal Workers v. Canada Post Corporation (Que.)(25093), the

   case is remanded to the Quebec Court of Appeal to be decided having regard

   to the reasons in the said  decisions, the whole without costs 29.5.97           684(96)                    1035(97)

Garantie, compagnie d’assurance de l’Amérique du Nord c. G. Beaudet

   et Compagnie Ltée (Qué.), 25538, *02 27.2.97                                             39(97)                      409(97)

Garcia v. United States of America (Crim.)(Ont.), 25450, *01 1.5.97                 143(97)                    828(97)

Garland v. Consumers’ Gas Co. (Ont.), 25644, *03 19.6.97                             341(97)                    1180(97)

Gaudreault c. Gaudreault (Qué.), 25595, *02 13.3.97                                       200(97)                    509(97)

Gauthier (Mark Anthony) v. The Queen (Ont.), 26255, *A                                 1868(97)

Gauthier (Thérèse) c. Landry (Qué.), 25091,Vu les arrêts Construction Gilles

   Paquette Ltée c. Entreprises Végo Ltée (Qué.)(25090) et Syndicat des postiers

   du Canada c.Société canadienne des postes (Qué.)(25093), l’affaire est renvoyée

   à la Cour d’appel du Québec pour qu’elle en décide, eu égard aux motifs desdits

   arrêts, le tout sans frais/In view of the decisions in Construction Gilles Paquette

   Ltée v. Entreprises Végo Ltée (Que.)(25090) and Canadian Union of Postal

   Workers v. Canada Post Corporation (Que.)(25093), the case is remanded to the

    Quebec Court of Appeal to be decided having regard to the reasons in the said

   decisions, the whole without costs 29.5.97                                                 682(96)                    1034(97)

Gauvin v. The Queen (Crim.)(N.B.), 25994, *01 18.9.97                                   1332(97)                   1535(97)

Gauvreau v. Paci (Ont.), 25628, *02 19.6.97                                                   342(97)                    1171(97)

Gazette c. M.G. (Qué.), 25782, *02 31.7.97                                                    1211(97)                   1452(97)

Genaille v. The Queen (Crim.)(Man.), 26196, *01 13.11.97                               1901(97)                   2019(97)

General Accident Assurance Co. of Canada v. State Farm Mutual Automobile

   Insurance Co. (N.B.), 24998, *05 10.6.97                                                    1141(97)                   1141(97)

Genge v. Parrill (Nfld.), 25948, *02 11.9.97                                                     1347(97)                   1529(97)

Germain c. Procureur général du Québec (Qué.), 25693, *01 20.3.97                458(97)                    555(97)