Martin v. Beaudry, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 898

 

Gérard Martin             Appellant

 

v.

 

Paul‑André Beaudry    Respondent

 

and

 

The Attorney General of Canada                                                                 Mis en cause

 

and

 

The National Parole Board                                                                                       Mis en cause

 

and between

 

Gérard Martin             Appellant

 

v.

 

Paul‑André Beaudry                                                                          Respondent

 

and

 

The National Parole Board and the Deputy Commissioner

of the Correctional Service of Canada                                             Mis en cause

 

and

 

The Attorney General of Canada                                                     Mis en cause

 

Indexed as: Martin v. Beaudry

 

File Nos.:  24847, 24844.

 

1996:  April 24.

 

Present:  Lamer C.J. and L'Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier and Iacobucci JJ.

 

on appeal from the court of appeal for quebec

 

                   Prerogative writs ‑‑ Habeas corpus ‑‑ Parole revoked -- Detention ‑‑ Application for writ of habeas corpus dismissed.

 

                   APPEALS from judgments of the Quebec Court of Appeal, [1995] Q.J. No. 330 (Q.L.) and [1995] Q.J. No. 329 (Q.L.), affirming judgments of the Superior Court, which had dismissed the appellant's applications for a writ of habeas corpus.  Appeals dismissed.

 

                   Renée Millette,  Jean‑Sébastien Clément and Hélène Danais, for the appellant.

 

                   Jennifer E. Briscoe and Richard Stark, for the respondent and the mis en cause.

 

                   English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by

 

1                 Lamer C.J. ‑‑ For the reasons given by Madam Justice Barrette‑Joncas, as well as those of Mr. Justice Boilard, the two appeals are dismissed without costs.

 

                   Judgment accordingly.

 

                   Solicitor for the appellant: Renée Millette, Montréal.

 

                   Solicitor for the respondent and the mis en cause:  The Attorney  General of Canada, Montréal.